There are two kinds of people talking about AI and meetings at the moment.
The first kind says AI will fix meetings entirely. Fewer attendees needed, better notes, smarter follow-up, lower cost per minute. Everything sorted.
The second kind says AI will make meetings worse. People will check out while the bot takes notes. Nobody will pay attention. The meeting becomes theatre and the AI becomes the only real participant.
Both of these are partially right and mostly incomplete. So here is what AI — specifically Microsoft Copilot and Claude's Cowork mode — can actually do for meetings right now, along with an honest account of the limits.
Microsoft Copilot in Teams
What it does
If your organisation has a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence, Copilot is available inside Teams meetings. Here is what it does in practice.
"What Copilot does not do: it cannot tell you whether a meeting was necessary. It cannot tell you whether the decision made was the right one. It cannot replace the judgment of the people in the room."
The honest limit of AI note-taking
Claude Cowork
What it adds — before the meeting
Where Copilot is strong during and after a meeting, Claude's Cowork mode is most useful before one.
What to try this week
1
If you have Copilot in Teams: use the intelligent meeting recap on your next three meetings. Read the summary before you write your own notes. See how much of what you thought mattered made it in — and what didn't.
2
If you use Claude or another AI assistant: write your next meeting agenda as questions, not topics. Use the AI to draft it. Then cut anything for which you cannot articulate the decision you are trying to reach.
3
Both experiments take less than 30 minutes. They will tell you more than any vendor demo.
The goal is not to make meetings more efficient. Efficiency is not the problem with most meetings. The problem is clarity: what is this for, who needs to be here, what are we deciding? AI can help with the scaffolding. The judgment is still yours.