Craig Stanley
Home / Capabilities / Microsoft 365 Copilot / Working out who needs a Copilot licence

Working out who needs a Copilot licence

A simple way to decide who gets a paid Copilot licence, based on the decisions people make, how often they search work content, and what usage data shows.

· 3 min read · Craig Stanley
In short, explained

Not everyone needs the paid helper. Give it to people who spend lots of time digging through work emails and files, and check after a while that they really use it.

Start from the work. People who often need answers buried in their own emails, meetings and files gain the most. People who mostly write from scratch or use the web may be fine on Copilot Chat. Then use Microsoft's usage report to check, and move licences if needed.

Segment by grounding need, frequency and agent use: licence those whose decisions depend on cross-source Graph retrieval or heavy tenant-grounded agent use; keep web-and-upload users on Copilot Chat. Validate with the Copilot usage report (7/28/90/180-day active users) and the Copilot Chat usage report, and review the licence position on a set cadence.

The question underneath

"Who needs a Copilot licence?" usually gets answered by job title or seniority. I think a better question is: whose decisions depend on finding things in their own work content? That's the job the paid licence does best, as described in What the paid Copilot licence adds.

Three questions per person

I'd ask three things about each role or person.

  1. How often do they need answers that are spread across their emails, meetings, chats and files? Daily, weekly, or rarely?
  2. Would they use agents grounded in shared tenant data, such as a SharePoint policy agent? For someone with Copilot Chat only, Microsoft meters those in Copilot Credits, while licensed users aren't charged for employee-facing use under their own identity.
  3. Could Copilot Chat do most of their work? Drafting from scratch, summarising a document they upload and researching the web all work well there.

A "daily" to the first question is a strong case for the licence. A "rarely" to the first and a "yes" to the third points to Copilot Chat.

Using the data you already have

Microsoft's Copilot usage report in the Microsoft 365 admin center shows how many people have a Copilot licence, how many are active, and the active users rate, across 7, 28, 90 or 180 days. Microsoft counts someone as active if they've intentionally used a Copilot feature in at least one app. There's a separate report for Copilot Chat usage by people without a licence. Names are concealed by default, so you may need your privacy settings reviewed before you can see them per person.

These reports show who used Copilot. They don't show whether that use mattered. I'd read them as a way to find the conversations worth having, as in Reading the Copilot usage report for licence decisions.

A worked example

This team and its numbers are illustrative.

A finance team of 12 has six licences today. The team lead fills in the three questions and checks 90 days of usage.

GroupPeopleSearch own contentTenant-grounded agentsActive on Copilot (90 days)Suggestion
Accounts payable leads3DailyYes3 of 3Keep licences
Analysts3WeeklySometimes1 of 3Talk to the two inactive people
Clerks6RarelyRarelyNot licensed; 5 of 6 use Copilot ChatStay on Copilot Chat

Before moving any licence, the team lead asks the two inactive analysts why. One was on leave. The other says Copilot didn't help with their main task, so that licence goes to a clerk who's been uploading the same supplier files to Copilot Chat every week.

Moving licences

How and when you can reassign or reduce licences depends on your agreement with Microsoft or your partner, so I'd check that before planning any changes. Licence decisions also have a human side. Taking a tool away from someone feels personal, so I'd explain the rule first and apply it to everyone the same way.

What I'm still checking

I haven't found a Microsoft report that shows how much of someone's Copilot use touched their organisational content compared with the web. That would answer my first question directly. Until I find one, I ask people.

Sources

Read next

A question to take awayWhich of these do you already pay for and not use?

About me

Craig Stanley

Microsoft AI consultant and technical architect, based in Whitley Bay. Over the last few years I've delivered Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio agents, Microsoft Foundry (formerly Azure AI Foundry) work and governance for UK public sector and financial services organisations.

What interests me is the decision underneath the tool: what it costs, what it risks, and whether a small, transparent model can make it better. I write the methods up here and on Substack so anyone can use them.

I write this site to learn in public: explaining each idea simply is how I check I understand it. Why I write this site.

Find me